Jump to content

Presidential Nomination: Attorney General


Steven Andrews

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Mr. Alexander @Dogslife, unless you have an opening statement I’d like to start with a question: what would be your top priority if confirmed as Attorney General?

Congress & Supreme Court Admin


Admin NPCs:
Rep. Derek H. Gray (D-TX-20)

Speaker of the House & Democratic Party Chair

 

The Hon. John Roberts

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Alexander, Eric Holder, former AG under President Obama, described himself as Obama’s “wing man” in his capacity as ash. Do you think this is an accurate portrayal of the job of the Attorney-General?

Christopher Drake

Republican, NY-2

Speaker of the United States House of Representatives

Former Chief Administrator - Rounds 4 & 5, Evil Arch-Conservative, Frequent Republican Player

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dogslife said:

Well that’s an easy one Senator. It would be to keep enforcing the laws and principles of this nation.

Glad to hear it, sir.

How will you address America’s “sanctuary cities,” which reject cooperation with federal immigration law and permit the residence of illegal aliens?

Congress & Supreme Court Admin


Admin NPCs:
Rep. Derek H. Gray (D-TX-20)

Speaker of the House & Democratic Party Chair

 

The Hon. John Roberts

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SWMissourian said:

Mr. Alexander, Eric Holder, former AG under President Obama, described himself as Obama’s “wing man” in his capacity as ash. Do you think this is an accurate portrayal of the job of the Attorney-General?

I think there should be a certain degree of cooperation with the president. But at that same token I think there should also be a large degree of independence.

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the individual right to keep and bear arms a fundamental right in your opinion? Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v Heller (2008)?

Congress & Supreme Court Admin


Admin NPCs:
Rep. Derek H. Gray (D-TX-20)

Speaker of the House & Democratic Party Chair

 

The Hon. John Roberts

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pinnacle said:

Glad to hear it, sir.

How will you address America’s “sanctuary cities,” which reject cooperation with federal immigration law and permit the residence of illegal aliens?

I think that this should be left up to local law enforcement agencies and local governments to decide. But that in no way means that I would surrender federal power on that issue.

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pinnacle said:

Is the individual right to keep and bear arms a fundamental right in your opinion? Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v Heller (2008)?

Yes I believe, that with the Heller decision, it is now the law of the land that individuals have the right to bear arms unconnected to militia service. But with that I also still believe that there can still be regulations on firearms. I agree with the majority opinion in saying 

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.”

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Alexander, thank you for being with us today. In 2011, President Obama directed the Justice Department to decline to defend the Defense of Marriage Act from litigation, and several years later both DOMA and state level same-sex marriage bans were overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. Do you believe it was appropriate for the President to issue such a directive to the Justice Department? Is that kind of directive something you would be comfortable with, were President Tillman to issue a similar directive?

Senator Holly Hawthorne (R-AK)

@HollyHawthorne | Join the Freedom Caucus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Dogslife said:

I think that this should be left up to local law enforcement agencies and local governments to decide. But that in no way means that I would surrender federal power on that issue.

Please clarify how you would leave the enforcement of federal immigration law up to communities while not surrendering federal power. Do you find that there’s a misalignment between federal immigration policy and state/local sanctuary city policy?

Congress & Supreme Court Admin


Admin NPCs:
Rep. Derek H. Gray (D-TX-20)

Speaker of the House & Democratic Party Chair

 

The Hon. John Roberts

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Brady said:

Mr. Alexander, thank you for being with us today. In 2011, President Obama directed the Justice Department to decline to defend the Defense of Marriage Act from litigation, and several years later both DOMA and state level same-sex marriage bans were overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. Do you believe it was appropriate for the President to issue such a directive to the Justice Department? Is that kind of directive something you would be comfortable with, were President Tillman to issue a similar directive?

I do believe it’s appropriate yes. To answer your other question I would say it all depends on the circumstances.

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pinnacle said:

Please clarify how you would leave the enforcement of federal immigration law up to communities while not surrendering federal power. Do you find that there’s a misalignment between federal immigration policy and state/local sanctuary city policy?

I would go about it just like the Obama Admin went about states legalizing marijuana. Letting states and cities have their laws but making clear the federal gov would not be surrendering its power.

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Dogslife said:

I would go about it just like the Obama Admin went about states legalizing marijuana. Letting states and cities have their laws but making clear the federal gov would not be surrendering its power.

You would let states decide their own immigration policies? Can you clarify how that makes clear that the federal government isn’t surrendering that power to local governments?

Christopher Drake

Republican, NY-2

Speaker of the United States House of Representatives

Former Chief Administrator - Rounds 4 & 5, Evil Arch-Conservative, Frequent Republican Player

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dogslife said:

Yes I believe, that with the Heller decision, it is now the law of the land that individuals have the right to bear arms unconnected to militia service. But with that I also still believe that there can still be regulations on firearms. I agree with the majority opinion in saying 

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited.”

What kind of regulations are you thinking? I’m also concerned with your phrasing that the Heller decision just “now” made it the law of the land that the people have the right to bear arms regardless of the militia, despite you later saying you agree with the majority’s opinion, which analyzed the grammar and historical context of the Second Amendment to show that the right to bear arms was never conditional on service in the militia. What did you mean by saying that it is “now” the law of the land with the Heller decision?

Christopher Drake

Republican, NY-2

Speaker of the United States House of Representatives

Former Chief Administrator - Rounds 4 & 5, Evil Arch-Conservative, Frequent Republican Player

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SWMissourian said:

You would let states decide their own immigration policies? Can you clarify how that makes clear that the federal government isn’t surrendering that power to local governments?

By saying the federal government still has power, just like what the Obama doj did with marijuana.

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SWMissourian said:

What kind of regulations are you thinking? I’m also concerned with your phrasing that the Heller decision just “now” made it the law of the land that the people have the right to bear arms regardless of the militia, despite you later saying you agree with the majority’s opinion, which analyzed the grammar and historical context of the Second Amendment to show that the right to bear arms was never conditional on service in the militia. What did you mean by saying that it is “now” the law of the land with the Heller decision?

I say now because it was a fairly recent decision. Only 8 years ago it was decided.

William C. Motter D-CO-02 (Boulder, Fort Collins, Broomfield)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...